Sammanfattning
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Runologists from Sophus Bugge (1866–67) to, most recently, Edith Marold (2010) have claimed that there was a Gothic (East Germanic) linguistic element amongst the older futhark inscriptions of Scandinavia. In the present paper, this claim is viewed against a horizon of nineteenth-century Danish and Swedish nationalism, where “Goths” and “Gothic” became politically sensitive terms in view of the purported emigration of the Goths from a homeland in Scandinavia. This is followed by a discussion of the linguistic assumptions underlying the classification of some of the early Scandinavian inscriptions as Gothic, assumptions which (with Peterson 1998) are all rejected — including Marold’s recent insistence on the final - a of the Etelhem clasp form wrta ’created’ being a Gothic 3 pt. sg. ind. ending, cf. Gothic waúrhta ‘worked’. It is argued that this - a is as likely to reflect an Old High German (or even West Germanic) suffix, cf. OHG frumita ‘(he) furthered’.
Ämnesord
- Humanities (hsv)
- Languages and Literature (hsv)
- Specific Languages (hsv)
- Humaniora (hsv)
- Språk och litteratur (hsv)
- Språkstudier (hsv)
- HUMANITIES and RELIGION (svep)
- Languages and linguistics (svep)
- Other Germanic languages (svep)
- Germanic languages (svep)
- HUMANIORA och RELIGIONSVETENSKAP (svep)
- Språkvetenskap (svep)
- Övriga germanska språk (svep)
- Germanistik (svep)
- Linguistics (uu)
- Lingvistik (uu)
Indexterm och SAB-rubrik
- Gothic
- Goths
- Early Runic
- older Scandinavian futhark inscriptions
- Etelhem clasp
- Gurfiles bracteate
- Mos lancehead
- linguistic variation
Inställningar
Hjälp
Beståndsinformation saknas